lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 06:47:47 +0200 From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> To: GeunSik Lim <leemgs1@...il.com> Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, tovalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH]man-pages : section 9 for kernel api description. Very late follow up here... On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:06 PM, GeunSik Lim<leemgs1@...il.com> wrote: > Thank you for your opinion. > > 2009/5/13 Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>: >> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:04:28AM +0900, GeunSik Lim wrote: >>> >>> >>>Dear Michael Kerrisk, >>> >>>Are you maintainer of man-pages(man-pages-3.XX.tar.gz)? >>>I am not sure... >> >> Yes, he is. >> >>> >>>I use fedora 9 distribution as Linux based Desktop OS currently. >>>I have one proposal about "#> man <linux-kernel-api>" command. >>>Can you tell me your opinion about below patch? >>>Thanks reading. >>> >>>commit 45e950c98412c002c47254507a199731315c7c2b >>>Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@...il.com> >>>Date: Wed May 13 10:49:47 2009 +0900 >>> >>> Append Section 9 info of man command. >>> >>> We view description of the Linux kernel API with man command. >>> For example, >>> Fedoar9#> yum install kernel-doc* >>> Fedora9#> man kobject_rename or >>> Fedora9#> man kthread_create >> >> Why? >> Why do you want kernel api doc be in man pages? >> Why not just browsing the kernel source code? >> > I want Michael to append patch file in the man-pages source that I > sent because > Many linux distributions (ex: Fedora , openSUSE, and so on ) already > support kernel api for man currently. > In general, kernel api(ex:kernel-doc-2.6.29.1-30.fc10.noarch.rpm) is > located in the > /usr/share/man/man9/ directory when we installed linux distribution > like Fedora by default. > So, I think that we need description and section 9 folder(man9) in the > man-pages source > to understand meaning of man 9. > > >> Kernel APIs are not stable at all, this is also a reason why you >> should not include their doc into man pages. > I agree that Kernel APIs is not stable. > But, I believe that we can utilize "#> man <linux-kernel-api>" command > in the own > Linux distribution easy to use about "uname -a" Linux kernel version. > This support is a valuable. I think that The problem deserves solving. I agree that there's a problem that needs solving here, but I don't think it's one that can be solved by man-0pages, whose mission is to document the kerenl-userpsace and libc APIs. (This doesn't mean that kernel APIs couldn't be documented in man pages, but it would be a different project.) Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Watch my Linux system programming book progress to publication! http://blog.man7.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists