linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: hv: Transform PDEVICE_OBJECT and DEVICE_OBJECT typedefs into their corresponding structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:40:31 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, hjanssen@...rosoft.com,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: hv: Transform PDEVICE_OBJECT and DEVICE_OBJECT typedefs into their corresponding structs

On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> Remove typedef DEVICE_OBJECT and use a struct with the same name
> instead. The new struct name uses lower case (struct device_object).
> 
> Remove typedef PDEVICE_OBJECT which aliases a pointer and use the
> corresponding renamed struct pointer (struct device_object *).
> 
> Here is the semantic patch generated to perform this transformation:
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
> 

The patch looks technically correct and improves the code, but
I'd suggest renaming the structure to fall into a proper namespace.
The name device_object is extremely generic and should not be
defined as part of a single driver.
Simply putting it into a namespace here would make it hv_device_object,
or even mshv_device_object ('hv' still is very generic), but then the
'object' part is still redundant. Since it is part of the 'vmbus'
layer, how about naming it 'struct vmbus_device'?

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/