linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:32:22 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the
 usb.current tree

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:17:40PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alan,
> > 
> > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:29:11 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > I need to look at the actual diff, but the combination looks completely
> > > bogus unless I'm misreading the fixup which is possible.
> > 
> > Below is the actual patch from the usb.current tree.
> 
> Thanks - ok that is probably safe. The change I was worried about (the
> error paths not adjusting port->count are ok as it gets zeroed within the
> mutex)
> 
> Not sure its safe versus hangup but neither was the old code 8)
> 
> Oliver: I'll send you an alternative patch later today/tomorrow that uses
> the ASYNC flags.

Should I just drop Oliver's existing patch from my tree for now then?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/