linux-kernel - Re: Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:49:38 -0700
From:	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
To:	Chad Talbott <ctalbott@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn, Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb_kupdate writeout

> An interesting recent-ish change is "writeback: speed up writeback of
> big dirty files."  When I revert the change to __sync_single_inode the
> problem appears to go away and background writeout proceeds at disk
> speed.  Interestingly, that code is in the git commit [2], but not in
> the post to LKML. [3]  This is may not be the fix, but it makes this
> test behave better.

I'm fairly sure this is not fixing the root cause - but putting it at the head
rather than the tail of the queue causes the error not to starve wb_kupdate
for nearly so long - as long as we keep the queue full, the bug is hidden.

M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/