linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  1 Aug 2009 16:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper

> Confused.  This patch has no effect.

Indeed, the three patches changing do_signal_stop() have no immediate
material effect.  They all just clean up the code and prepare the hooks
that utrace (or something like it) needs to make tracing stops mesh well
with job control stops.  I'd thought it might be simpler for review to just
roll these three together and send you a single patch to replace
signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch; but Oleg decided to keep it
sliced smaller.

Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/