lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:02:17 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote: > > > - /proc/pid/oom_score is inconsistent when the thread that set the > > > effective per-mm oom_adj exits and it is now obsolete since you have > > > no way to determine what the next effective oom_adj value shall be. > > > > > plz re-caluculate it. it's not a big job if done in lazy way. > > > > You can't recalculate it if all the remaining threads have a different > oom_adj value than the effective oom_adj value from the thread that is now > exited. Then, crazy google apps pass different oom_adjs to each thread ? And, threads other than thread-group-leader modifies its oom_adj. Hmm, interesting. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists