linux-kernel - Re: Boot failure on x86_64 (OOPS set_cpu_sibling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:50:29 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Cc:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Boot failure on x86_64 (OOPS set_cpu_sibling_map() )


* Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > The thing that was blocking this commit is really the insufficient 
> > sched-domains integration of said NUMA bits. I think the NUMA bits 
> > look good and if the EDAC tree makes use of it we can merge it in 
> > .32.
> >
> > Mind preparing a separate branch for it (.31-rc5 based) and send me 
> > a pull request so that we can share the commit between the EDAC tree 
> > and the x86 tree?
> 
> Well, Andreas says the patches need a little polishing and he'll 
> be sending updated versions soon so you can pick them up. And 
> since the EDAC MCE stuff might still change before .32 merge 
> window opens, let's synchronize our pull requests instead. In the 
> meantime, I'll be rediffing the EDAC stuff against -tip for 
> linux-next.

Would you rebase just due to this commit? No need for that, feel 
free to carry it until Andreas sends an updated version. Then i can 
put it into a separate .31-rc5 based topic that you can pull into 
the EDAC tree.

That way there are no rebases really and no dependencies.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/