linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-07-30-05-01 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:12:59 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	npiggin@...e.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-07-30-05-01 uploaded

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:04:28 -0700
akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:

> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-07-30-05-01 has been uploaded to
> 
>    http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> 
> and will soon be available at
> 
>    git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/mmotm.git
> 

I'm sorry if already reported. When using SLQB, this warning is shown.


[    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2131 trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb1/0x12f()
[    0.000000] Hardware name: VMware Virtual Platform
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-mm1 #1
[    0.000000] Call Trace:
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81060189>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb1/0x12f
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8103e14a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa4
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c8f4c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8103e186>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x11
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81060189>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb1/0x12f
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81060214>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c8f4c>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c89f2>] ? __down_write_nested+0x1c/0xa9
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c8a0f>] __down_write_nested+0x39/0xa9
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810b97f6>] ? kmem_cache_open+0x2b1/0x460
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c8a8a>] __down_write+0xb/0xd
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff814c802d>] down_write+0x4a/0x4e
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810b97f6>] ? kmem_cache_open+0x2b1/0x460
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810b97f6>] kmem_cache_open+0x2b1/0x460
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff818247bc>] kmem_cache_init+0x4d/0x352
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8181b837>] ? mem_init+0x156/0x161
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81808adf>] start_kernel+0x1cd/0x3ab
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8180829a>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaa/0xae
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8180837f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe1/0xe8
[    0.000000] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
[    0.000000] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled *very* early, fixing it

This is because down_write() uses spin_lock_irq(), not spin_lock_irqsave().
I think this is sane because down_write() is not called under irq-disabled.
By this, irq is enabled before init_IRQ().

SLUB don't have this bug because it uses special routine for initializing
kmalloc area. (See slub.c::create_kmalloc_cache(), it's commented.)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/