lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:01:01 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KEYS: Add garbage collection for dead, revoked and
	expired keys.

Quoting David Howells (dhowells@...hat.com):
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > These two lines (repeated below) beg for a helper?
> 
> Yeah...  Seems reasonable.
> 
> > Can this happen?  This implies that the number of live keys
> > went up, but we're under keyring->sem?
> 
> An expired key can be updated back to life:
> 
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl  add user a a @s
> 	619170185
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl timeout 619170185 5
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl  show
> 	Session Keyring
> 	       -3 --alswrv      0     0  keyring: _ses
> 	627083299 --alswrv      0    -1   \_ keyring: _uid.0
> 	619170185 --alswrv      0     0   \_ user: a
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl  show
> 	Session Keyring
> 	       -3 --alswrv      0     0  keyring: _ses
> 	627083299 --alswrv      0    -1   \_ keyring: _uid.0
> 	619170185: key inaccessible (Key has expired)
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl  add user a a @s
> 	619170185
> 	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl  show
> 	Session Keyring
> 	       -3 --alswrv      0     0  keyring: _ses
> 	627083299 --alswrv      0    -1   \_ keyring: _uid.0
> 	619170185 --alswrv      0     0   \_ user: a

This won't require keyring->sem?

> > > +		.data = &key_gc_delay,
> > 
> > I see where this variable is defined at top of the patch, but
> > I don't see where it is actually used?
> 
> Bah!  I forgot to add gc.c to the mix.  Sorry about that.
> 
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ