linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-08-04-14-22 uploaded (ummunotify)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:38:29 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-08-04-14-22 uploaded (ummunotify)

 > ummunotify.c:(.text+0x8f217): undefined reference to `__get_user_X'
 > 
 > when building for i386.
 > 
 > The get_user() and put_user() in ummunotify_exchange_features()
 > are correctly converted to __get_user_4() and __put_user_4(),
 > but the get_user() in ummunotify_unregister_region() becomes
 > __get_user_X()  [as seen in objdump output].

Is 64-bit get_user() supposed to work portably?  Because it seems that
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h intentionally makes get_user((__u64))
expand to __get_user_X() and then never defines __get_user_X().  And
arm, say, expands it to __get_user_bad().  But on the other hand,
powerpc and sparc seem to go to the trouble of defining a 64-bit
get_user() for 32-bit builds...

My fault for insufficient 32-bit compile testing.  Andrew, I'll send a
patch to change to copy_from_user() instead.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/