lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:39:38 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	scgtrp@...il.com, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 2/3] kcore: fix vread/vwrite to be aware of
 holes.

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:24:57 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:08:43 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * To do safe access to this _mapped_ area, we need
> > > > +		 * lock. But adding lock here means that we need to add
> > > > +		 * overhead of vmalloc()/vfree() calles for this _debug_
> > > > +		 * interface, rarely used. Instead of that, we'll use
> > > > +		 * kmap() and get small overhead in this access function.
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		if (p) {
> > > > +			/* we can expect USR1 is not used */
> > > 
> > > It would be nice if the comment were to explain _why_ KM_USER1 is known
> > > to be free here.
> > > 
> > ok, will do. Hmm, but KM_USR0 is better ?
> > I'm not sure difference between KM_USR0/KM_USR1...
> 
> KM_USER0 is conventionally the first one to use.  We only use KM_USER1
> if it is known that KM_USER0 is already used.
> 
Hmm, It sounds better to update this to use KM_USER0 when I applying Amerigo's comment.

Thanks,
-Kame


> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +			void *map = kmap_atomic(p, KM_USER1);
> > > > +			memcpy(buf, map + offset, length);
> > > > +			kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER1);
> > > 
> > > Can use clear_highpage().
> > > 
> > ah, "buf" is expected to be kmalloc'ed buffer. I'll explain it in Usage
> > or adds comment.
> > 
> 
> argh, memcpy != memset.  I knew that ;)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists