linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix cumul hit based sub-total

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:22:16 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix cumul hit based sub-total

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 07:11 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > The callchain fractal mode builds each new total hits in a new branch
> > of profiling by using the parent's hits of the current branch plus the
> > hits of the children.
> > 
> > This is wrong, the total hits of a branch should be made of the sum of
> > every children hits, we must ignore the parent hits in this scope.
> > 
> > This patch also fixes another mistakes with the hit counting.
> > 
> > Now the rates are corrects.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> > ---
> 
> Ah will this fix these instances where you'd have things like
> 
>                 |                     page_fault
>                 |                     |
>                 |                     |--100.00%-- __strcmp_sse2
>                 |                     |          copy_dep_chain
>                 |                     |          __libc_start_main
>                 |                     |
>                 |                      --100.00%-- gettimeofday
>                 |                                __libc_start_main



I haven't met such huge rate's mistake yet :)
It was more about +-20% of imprecision.

I guess this patch should fix what you've met. If you still see that,
please tell me.

BTW, I will soon add a debug option to check the percentage correctness
and things like that...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/