| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:49:35 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/21] kvm/svm: consolidate nested_svm_exit_handled
When caching guest intercepts there is no need anymore for the
nested_svm_exit_handled_real function. So move its code into
nested_svm_exit_handled.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 75fdfe7..b2c9a9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1459,15 +1459,58 @@ static int nested_svm_do(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
return retval;
}
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
- void *arg1,
- void *arg2,
- void *opaque)
+static int nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+ void *arg1, void *arg2,
+ void *opaque)
+{
+ struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
+ u8 *msrpm = (u8 *)arg2;
+ u32 t0, t1;
+ u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+ u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
+
+ if (!(nested_vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
+ return 0;
+
+ switch (msr) {
+ case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+ t0 = (msr * 2) % 8;
+ t1 = msr / 8;
+ break;
+ case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+ t0 = (8192 + msr - 0xc0000000) * 2;
+ t1 = (t0 / 8);
+ t0 %= 8;
+ break;
+ case 0xc0010000 ... 0xc0011fff:
+ t0 = (16384 + msr - 0xc0010000) * 2;
+ t1 = (t0 / 8);
+ t0 %= 8;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool kvm_override)
{
- bool kvm_overrides = *(bool *)opaque;
u32 exit_code = svm->vmcb->control.exit_code;
- if (kvm_overrides) {
+ switch (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code) {
+ case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
+ return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb,
+ svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
+ nested_svm_exit_handled_msr);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (kvm_override) {
switch (exit_code) {
case SVM_EXIT_INTR:
case SVM_EXIT_NMI:
@@ -1529,60 +1572,6 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_handled_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
return 0;
}
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
- void *arg1, void *arg2,
- void *opaque)
-{
- struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
- u8 *msrpm = (u8 *)arg2;
- u32 t0, t1;
- u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
- u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
-
- if (!(nested_vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
- return 0;
-
- switch(msr) {
- case 0 ... 0x1fff:
- t0 = (msr * 2) % 8;
- t1 = msr / 8;
- break;
- case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
- t0 = (8192 + msr - 0xc0000000) * 2;
- t1 = (t0 / 8);
- t0 %= 8;
- break;
- case 0xc0010000 ... 0xc0011fff:
- t0 = (16384 + msr - 0xc0010000) * 2;
- t1 = (t0 / 8);
- t0 %= 8;
- break;
- default:
- return 1;
- break;
- }
- if (msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0))
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool kvm_override)
-{
- bool k = kvm_override;
-
- switch (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code) {
- case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
- return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb,
- svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
- nested_svm_exit_handled_msr);
- default: break;
- }
-
- return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, 0, &k,
- nested_svm_exit_handled_real);
-}
-
static inline void copy_vmcb_control_area(struct vmcb *dst_vmcb, struct vmcb *from_vmcb)
{
struct vmcb_control_area *dst = &dst_vmcb->control;
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists