[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:41:56 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tty: handle VT specific compat ioctls in vt driver
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 02:34:53AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:02:11PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 07 August 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Ok. This looks like a nice series. A bkl pushdown that only goes down
> > > in one site among several others enlightens the understanding of what it
> > > is protecting (beside the nice fact it also burned three bkl callsites :-)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Well, most importantly patch 5/5 fixes a long-standing bug where we held
> > the BKL in lots of places that were already proven not to need it, or
> > alternatively held it twice (nested) in the ioctls that may still need it.
> >
> > I did patch 3/5 this way because I read that you were working on BKL
> > removal for TTY and wanted to do my share by removing the dependency
> > on the code that I care about (fs/compat_ioctl.h).
> >
> > Arnd <><
>
> Thanks!
>
> I guess these patches could fit in the tty tree, unless someone has
> objections?
I've taken this patch, I didn't see any others sent to me :(
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists