linux-kernel - [GIT PULL, v2] core kernel fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:19:41 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"lkml, " <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL, v2] core kernel fixes


* Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Linus,
>>
>> Please pull the latest core-fixes-for-linus git tree from:
>>
>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core-fixes-for-linus
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>> 	Ingo
>>
>> ------------------>
>> Darren Hart (2):
>>       rtmutex: Avoid deadlock in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
>>       futex: Update woken requeued futex_q lock_ptr
>
> Ingo, this still has the older version of:
>
> "futex: Update woken requeued futex_q lock_ptr"
>
> Please update to the resend on Aug 7:

Resend usual means 'same stuff again' and since i already had the 
first patch i skipped it. The usual way is to put 'v2' into the 
subject or something. Anyway - v2 needs re-testing.

Linus, please pull this shortened tree instead (it has the final 
commit removed):

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core-fixes-for-linus-2

 Thanks,

	Ingo

------------------>
Darren Hart (1):
      rtmutex: Avoid deadlock in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()

Li Zefan (2):
      lockdep: Fix file mode of lock_stat
      lockdep: Fix typos in documentation


 Documentation/lockdep-design.txt |    6 +++---
 kernel/lockdep_proc.c            |    3 ++-
 kernel/rtmutex.c                 |    4 +---
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/lockdep-design.txt
index e20d913..abf768c 100644
--- a/Documentation/lockdep-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/lockdep-design.txt
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ State
 The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits:
 
 - 'ever held in STATE context'
-- 'ever head as readlock in STATE context'
-- 'ever head with STATE enabled'
-- 'ever head as readlock with STATE enabled'
+- 'ever held as readlock in STATE context'
+- 'ever held with STATE enabled'
+- 'ever held as readlock with STATE enabled'
 
 Where STATE can be either one of (kernel/lockdep_states.h)
  - hardirq
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
index d7135aa..e94caa6 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -758,7 +758,8 @@ static int __init lockdep_proc_init(void)
 		    &proc_lockdep_stats_operations);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
-	proc_create("lock_stat", S_IRUSR, NULL, &proc_lock_stat_operations);
+	proc_create("lock_stat", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, NULL,
+		    &proc_lock_stat_operations);
 #endif
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index fcd107a..29bd4ba 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -1039,16 +1039,14 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock) || try_to_steal_lock(lock, task)) {
 		/* We got the lock for task. */
 		debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock);
-
 		rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task, 0);
-
+		spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task);
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
 
-
 	if (ret && !waiter->task) {
 		/*
 		 * Reset the return value. We might have
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/