linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0b/4] intel_txt: Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support for Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:21:45 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	"jbeulich@...ell.com" <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	"peterm@...hat.com" <peterm@...hat.com>,
	"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0b/4] intel_txt: Intel(R) Trusted Execution
	Technology support for Linux - Details

Right, that was the point.

Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

>> The question is: if the user doesn't want S3, do they still need to
>> enable S3 in order to be able to use TXT?  Otherwise, this code needs to
>> be properly conditionalized.
>
>I doubt that's the case. Ifdef is likely the right answer.
>
>-Andi
>
>-- 
>ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.