linux-kernel - Re: state of the fastboot activities?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:33:26 +0200
From:	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: state of the fastboot activities?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:28:26AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > That's bad :-) So there is no room for improvement any more in our
> > ARM boot sequences ...
>
> on x86 we're doing pretty well ;-)

On i.MX27 (400 MHz ARM926EJ-S) we currently need 7 s, measured from
power-on through the kernel up to "starting init". This is with

- no delay in u-boot-v2
- rootfs on NAND (UBIFS)
- quiet
- precalculated loops-per-jiffy
- zImage kernel instead of uImage

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/