linux-kernel - Re: ata_tf_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:33:55 +0900 (JST)
From:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:	htejun@...il.com
Cc:	jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ata_tf_read_block() question

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:15:31 +0900, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> > It seems inconsistent.  The correct calculation is:
> > 	block = (cyl * dev->heads + head) * dev->sectors + sect - 1;
> > isn't it?
> 
> Yes, indeed.
> 
> > I don't have any real problem.  Just noticed by code reading.
> 
> ata_tf_read_block() currently is used only when reporting failed block
> address to upper layer so off-by-one bug there wouldn't be too
> visible, especially for the venerable CHS addressing.

Thank you for checking.

> Care to submit a patch w/ warning message and capping for sect == 0
> case?

Well, I expect fix by you (or other libata hackers) since I think you
can write better warning message and changelog than me ;)

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/