| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:59:35 +0300 From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects On 08/17/2009 05:16 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: >> My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better >> off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has >> widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support. >> >> It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to >> virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean >> design wise). So far I haven't seen any indications that it is. >> >> > > The design is very different, so hopefully I can start to convince you > why it might be interesting. > We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear (and steal) them though. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists