linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:18:08 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for	vbus_driver
 objects

On 08/17/2009 06:09 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> We've been through this before I believe.  If you can point out specific
>> differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear
>> (and steal) them though.
>>
>>      
> You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh?
>
>    

If I've offended you, I apologize.

> Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it
> apparently falls on deaf ears.
>    

Well, I'm sorry, I truly don't think I've had that question answered 
with specificity.  I'm really interested in it (out of a selfish desire 
to improve virtio), but the only comment I recall from you was to the 
effect that the virtio rings were better than ioq in terms of cache 
placement.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/