lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:19:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, jiayingz@...gle.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] add ftrace_event_call void * 'data' field


On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:52:44PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > add an optional * void pointer to 'ftrace_event_call' that is
> > passed in for regfunc and unregfunc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  include/linux/ftrace_event.h |    5 +++--
> >  include/trace/ftrace.h       |    4 ++--
> >  kernel/trace/trace_events.c  |    4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > index ac8c6f8..8544f12 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > @@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ struct ftrace_event_call {
> >  	struct dentry		*dir;
> >  	struct trace_event	*event;
> >  	int			enabled;
> > -	int			(*regfunc)(void);
> > -	void			(*unregfunc)(void);
> > +	int			(*regfunc)(void *);
> > +	void			(*unregfunc)(void *);
> >  	int			id;
> >  	int			(*raw_init)(void);
> >  	int			(*show_format)(struct trace_seq *s);
> > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct ftrace_event_call {
> >  	int			filter_active;
> >  	struct event_filter	*filter;
> >  	void			*mod;
> > +	void			*data;
> >  
> >  	atomic_t		profile_count;
> >  	int			(*profile_enable)(struct ftrace_event_call *);
> > diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > index 80e5f6c..a0de384 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
> > @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static void ftrace_raw_event_##call(proto)				\
> >  		trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit(event, irq_flags, pc); \
> >  }									\
> >  									\
> > -static int ftrace_raw_reg_event_##call(void)				\
> > +static int ftrace_raw_reg_event_##call(void *ptr)			\
> 
> 
> Shouldn't it have a __used attribute here, or something?

Do function parameters need that? There's lots of places where the 
parameter of a function is not used by a function itself.

-- Steve

> 
> 
> >  {									\
> >  	int ret;							\
> >  									\
> > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int ftrace_raw_reg_event_##call(void)				\
> >  	return ret;							\
> >  }									\
> >  									\
> > -static void ftrace_raw_unreg_event_##call(void)				\
> > +static void ftrace_raw_unreg_event_##call(void *ptr)			\
> 
> 
> 
> Same here.
> 
> 
> 
> >  {									\
> >  	unregister_trace_##call(ftrace_raw_event_##call);		\
> >  }									\
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > index f95f847..1d289e2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > @@ -86,14 +86,14 @@ static void ftrace_event_enable_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
> >  		if (call->enabled) {
> >  			call->enabled = 0;
> >  			tracing_stop_cmdline_record();
> > -			call->unregfunc();
> > +			call->unregfunc(call->data);
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	case 1:
> >  		if (!call->enabled) {
> >  			call->enabled = 1;
> >  			tracing_start_cmdline_record();
> > -			call->regfunc();
> > +			call->regfunc(call->data);
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 1.6.2.5
> > 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ