linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/3 v2] ARM: OMAP: DMA: Add support for DMA channel self linking on OMAP1510

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:38:05 +0200
From:	Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/3 v2] ARM: OMAP: DMA: Add support for DMA channel self linking on OMAP1510

Sunday 23 August 2009 20:05:43 Mark Brown wrote:
> If none of your patches have been applied

Mark,

I did not say that. You have applied patches 2/3 [1] and 3/3 [2] from the 
series.

> then what are the other 
> patches that depend on this? Nobody reported any issues in testing with 
> the other OMAP patches.

Dependency on patch 1/3 is not compile time, but run time, and OMAP1510 
specific, that's probably why nobody has reported any issues.

> I don't really mind which tree these go via but I rather suspect that
> ALSA will be better given all the other changes and I also suspect that
> you'll need to regenerate your changes against a current tree due to
> those changes.

arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c has not been touched since 2009-05-28 in yours [3] 
and since 2009-06-23 in Takashi's tree, so my patch, whether original or v2, 
should still be up to date. That may change if it is to be pushed via OMAP 
tree.

Sorry for all that noise.

Thanks,
Janusz

[1]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=64844a6ac8ddd586cb832fea7cf2e93e5e7e03f4
[2]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=471e3dec3abe2d41e8c742046353fcb01bc2459e
[3]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=44169075e6eaa87bab6a296209d8d0610879b394
[4]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=aecedb94b366d6fb5e2a17ca18a5dc78e593198e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/