linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] direct-io: make O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:58:59 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, htejun@...il.com, bzolnier@...il.com,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] direct-io: make O_DIRECT IO path be page based

On Thu, Aug 20 2009, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:17 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Currently we pass in the iovec array and let the O_DIRECT core
> > handle the get_user_pages() business. This work, but it means that
> > we can ever only use user pages for O_DIRECT.
> > 
> > Switch the aops->direct_IO() and below code to use page arrays
> > instead, so that it doesn't make any assumptions about who the pages
> > belong to. This works directly for all users but NFS, which just
> > uses the same helper that the generic mapping read/write functions
> > also call.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_segment(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
> > -						 const struct iovec *iov,
> > -						 loff_t pos, int sync)
> > +						 struct dio_args *args,
> > +						 int sync)
> >  {
> >  	struct nfs_open_context *ctx = dreq->ctx;
> >  	struct inode *inode = ctx->path.dentry->d_inode;
> > -	unsigned long user_addr = (unsigned long)iov->iov_base;
> > -	size_t count = iov->iov_len;
> > +	unsigned long user_addr = args->user_addr;
> > +	size_t count = args->length;
> >  	struct rpc_task *task;
> >  	struct rpc_message msg = {
> >  		.rpc_cred = ctx->cred,
> > @@ -726,24 +702,8 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_segment(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
> >  		if (unlikely(!data))
> >  			break;
> >  
> > -		down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> > -		result = get_user_pages(current, current->mm, user_addr,
> > -					data->npages, 0, 0, data->pagevec, NULL);
> > -		up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> > -		if (result < 0) {
> > -			nfs_writedata_free(data);
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> > -		if ((unsigned)result < data->npages) {
> > -			bytes = result * PAGE_SIZE;
> > -			if (bytes <= pgbase) {
> > -				nfs_direct_release_pages(data->pagevec, result);
> > -				nfs_writedata_free(data);
> > -				break;
> > -			}
> > -			bytes -= pgbase;
> > -			data->npages = result;
> > -		}
> > +		data->pagevec = args->pages;
> > +		data->npages = args->nr_segs;
> >  
> >  		get_dreq(dreq);
> >  
> 
> This looks a bit odd. What guarantees that args->pages contain <= wsize
> bytes? The server will not accept larger segments in a single RPC call.

Nothing, thanks for the info. The NFS bits are still very much untested,
I'll post an update soon.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/