2.6.30-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Alan Stern commit 7a0f0d951273eee889c2441846842348ebc00a2a upstream. This patch (as1273) fixes two(!) bugs introduced by the new Clear-TT-Buffer implementation in ehci-hcd. It is now possible for an idle QH to have some URBs on its queue -- this will happen if a Clear-TT-Buffer is pending for the QH's endpoint. Consequently we should not issue a warning when someone tries to unlink an URB from an idle QH; instead we should process the request immediately. The refcounts for QHs could get messed up, because submit_async() would increment the refcount when calling qh_link_async() and qh_link_async() would then refuse to link the QH into the schedule if a Clear-TT-Buffer was pending. Instead we should increment the refcount only when the QH actually is added to the schedule. The current code tries to be clever by leaving the refcount alone if an unlink is immediately followed by a relink; the patch changes this to an unconditional decrement and increment (although they occur in the opposite order). Signed-off-by: Alan Stern CC: David Brownell Tested-by: Manuel Lauss Tested-by: Matthijs Kooijman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 3 ++- drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c @@ -903,7 +903,8 @@ static int ehci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_h /* already started */ break; case QH_STATE_IDLE: - WARN_ON(1); + /* QH might be waiting for a Clear-TT-Buffer */ + qh_completions(ehci, qh); break; } break; --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ static void qh_link_async (struct ehci_h head->qh_next.qh = qh; head->hw_next = dma; + qh_get(qh); qh->xacterrs = QH_XACTERR_MAX; qh->qh_state = QH_STATE_LINKED; /* qtd completions reported later by interrupt */ @@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ submit_async ( * the HC and TT handle it when the TT has a buffer ready. */ if (likely (qh->qh_state == QH_STATE_IDLE)) - qh_link_async (ehci, qh_get (qh)); + qh_link_async(ehci, qh); done: spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ehci->lock, flags); if (unlikely (qh == NULL)) @@ -1113,8 +1114,6 @@ static void end_unlink_async (struct ehc && HC_IS_RUNNING (ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->state)) qh_link_async (ehci, qh); else { - qh_put (qh); // refcount from async list - /* it's not free to turn the async schedule on/off; leave it * active but idle for a while once it empties. */ @@ -1122,6 +1121,7 @@ static void end_unlink_async (struct ehc && ehci->async->qh_next.qh == NULL) timer_action (ehci, TIMER_ASYNC_OFF); } + qh_put(qh); /* refcount from async list */ if (next) { ehci->reclaim = NULL; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/