linux-kernel - Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:00:49 +0200
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Markus Tornqvist <mjt@...v.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, kernel@...ivas.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

On Lunes 07 Septiembre 2009 17:24:29 Xavier Bestel escribió:
> Except on your typical smartphone, which will run linux and probably
> vastly outnumber the number of "traditional" linux desktops.

Smartphones will probably start using ARM dualcore cpus the next year,
the embedded land is no SMP-free.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/