linux-kernel - [2.6.31-rc9] hotplug SATA vs lockdep: false positive?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:20:42 +0100
From:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.31-rc9] hotplug SATA vs lockdep: false positive?

When hot-plugging my SATA DVD drive into my laptop, I see a lockdep
warning [1]. On closer inspection, both flush_workqueue() and
worker_thread() do tricks with lockdep maps. False positive?

Daniel

--- [1]

$ dmesg
ata2: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4040000 action 0xe frozen
ata2: irq_stat 0x00000040, connection status changed
ata2: SError: { CommWake DevExch }
ata2: hard resetting link
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-rc9-290cd #1
-------------------------------------------------------
kacpi_hotplug/198 is trying to acquire lock:
 (kacpid){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81073a70>] flush_workqueue+0x0/0xf0
(workqueue.c:292)

but task is already holding lock:
 (&dpc->work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81072a42>]
worker_thread+0x1f2/0x3c0 (bitops.h:101)
which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&dpc->work){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108eb19>] __lock_acquire+0xe29/0x1240
       [<ffffffff8108f04e>] lock_acquire+0x11e/0x170
       [<ffffffff81072a92>] worker_thread+0x242/0x3c0 (workqueue.c:291)
       [<ffffffff81077456>] kthread+0xa6/0xc0
       [<ffffffff8100d29a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

-> #0 (kacpid){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108ebe1>] __lock_acquire+0xef1/0x1240
       [<ffffffff8108f04e>] lock_acquire+0x11e/0x170
       [<ffffffff81073acc>] flush_workqueue+0x5c/0xf0 (workqueue.c:403)
       [<ffffffff812f6eaf>] acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x10/0x1e
       [<ffffffff812f6ee7>] acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred+0x2a/0x3e
       [<ffffffff81072a98>] worker_thread+0x248/0x3c0 (workqueue.c:292)
       [<ffffffff81077456>] kthread+0xa6/0xc0
       [<ffffffff8100d29a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by kacpi_hotplug/198:
 #0:  (kacpi_hotplug){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81072a42>]
worker_thread+0x1f2/0x3c0
 #1:  (&dpc->work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81072a42>] worker_thread+0x1f2/0x3c0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 198, comm: kacpi_hotplug Tainted: G         C 2.6.31-rc9-290cd #1

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108c8a7>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa7/0x100
 [<ffffffff8108ebe1>] __lock_acquire+0xef1/0x1240
 [<ffffffff8108a808>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x58/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108f04e>] lock_acquire+0x11e/0x170
 [<ffffffff81073a70>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xf0 (workqueue.c:397)
 [<ffffffff812f6ebd>] ? acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred+0x0/0x3e
 [<ffffffff81073acc>] flush_workqueue+0x5c/0xf0 (workqueue.c:403)
 [<ffffffff81073a70>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xf0 (workqueue.c:397)
 [<ffffffff812f6eaf>] acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x10/0x1e drivers/acpi/osl.c
 [<ffffffff812f6ee7>] acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred+0x2a/0x3e
 [<ffffffff81072a98>] worker_thread+0x248/0x3c0 (workqueue.c:292)
 [<ffffffff81072a42>] ? worker_thread+0x1f2/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff81077900>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
 [<ffffffff81072850>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff81077456>] kthread+0xa6/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8100d29a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff8100cbd4>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff810773b0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8100d290>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.SATA.PRT1 - docking
ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-U20N, HX12, max UDMA/133
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata2: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0xf t4
ata2: irq_stat 0x40000001
ata2: hard resetting link
ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:10:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: ACPI cmd e3/00:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata2: EH complete
scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROM            HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-U20N  HX12 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5
-- 
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/