lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:28:22 +1000 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements > The TLB is SW loaded, yes. However it should not do any misses on kernel > space, since the whole segment is in a wired TLB entry. Including vmalloc space ? Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists