linux-kernel - Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:59:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:20 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > One thing I also noticed is that when I have logged in, I run xmodmap
> > manually to load some keymappings (I always tell myself to add this to
> > the log in scripts, but I suspend/resume this laptop for weeks at the
> > time and forget before the next boot). With the stock kernel, xmodmap
> > will halt X updates and take forever to run. With BFS, it returned
> > instantly. As I would expect.
> 
> Can you provide a little more detail (I'm a xmodmap n00b), how 
> does one run xmodmap and maybe provide your xmodmap config?

(and which version did you use, just in case it matters.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/