linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: Clean up trace.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:19:43 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	rostedt@...dmis.org
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Clean up trace.h

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:55 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> - remove some dead code
>> - remove @stats from struct tracer
>> - move DEFINE_COMPARISON_PRED() and DEFINE_EQUALITY_PRED()
>>   to kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> 
> Thanks Li, I'll apply it. Just curious, do you have a tool to find dead
> code, or is it just by review?
> 

No, no tool, otherwise I would have run it on the whole kernel
tree and made tons of patches. ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/