linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] increase rcutorture intensity and fix a couple resulting bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:46:00 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] increase rcutorture intensity and fix
	a couple resulting bugs


* Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:

> On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:53:49 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said:
> > This patch series increases the intensity of rcutorture testing for
> > TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and provides fixes for a couple resulting bugs.
> 
> Minor bisection nit - should patch 1/3 be renumbered to 3/3, so 
> the two bugfix patches go in before the patch that makes the 
> unpatched bugs visible? Otherwise if a bisect waypoint happens to 
> land on 1/3, oddness can happen...

Makes perfect sense - i've queued them up like that.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/