| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:11:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] TPM: Fixup pcrs sysfs file On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:25:20 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:36:39PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > > That sounds like a fairly serious bug, and this looks like a 2.6.31 > > > > patch. > > > > Any comments from the maintainers on this patch? > > FWIW, I didn't mention in the patch emails, but all the patches I sent > fix regressions that have been introduced in the past couple years by > clean up patches that never tested the code paths they alter. > > What becomes of patches that end up in the mm tree? Do they still > route through you for mainline inclusion? I'll be sending tpm patches to James henceforth. I presently have tpm-fixup-pcrs-sysfs-file.patch tpm-fixup-pcrs-sysfs-file-update.patch tpm-fix-up-pubek-sysfs-file.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists