linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/72] Blackfin updates for 2.6.32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:54:17 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/72] Blackfin updates for 2.6.32

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 18:36, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> this code i had rewritten and as fallout, the style changed.  looks
>> fine to me, and no, this particular checpatch "error" is not always
>> worthwhile (like in this case).
>
> Have you read Documentation/CodingStyle ? Can you better explain why
> your don't want to follow that document ? Most people accept that to be
> the style of code in Linux, and that is what checkpatch checks for..

sorry, never heard of Documentation/
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/