lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:47:38 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, parag.lkml@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, srostedt@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:tracing/core] tracing: make testing syscall events a separate configuration

Commit-ID:  1f5a6b45416694ff8c0d04625f1a438a0e380add
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/1f5a6b45416694ff8c0d04625f1a438a0e380add
Author:     Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:58:24 -0400
Committer:  Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:58:24 -0400

tracing: make testing syscall events a separate configuration

Parag noticed that the number of event tests has increased tremendously:

grep "Testing event" dmesg.31rc9 |wc -l
100

grep "Testing event" dmesg.31git |wc -l
1172

This is due to the testing of every syscall event when ftrace self
test is enabled. This adds a bit more time to kernel boot up and can
affect development by slowing down the time it takes between reboots.

This option makes the testing of the syscall events into a separate
config, to still be able to test most of ftrace internals at boot up
but not have to wait for all the syscall events to be tested.

The syscall event testing only tests the enabling and disabling of
the trace point, since the syscalls are not executed. What really needs
to be done is to somehow have a userspace tool test the syscall tracepoints
as well.

Reported-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
LKML-Reference: <f7848160909130815l3e768a30n3b28808bbe5c254b@...l.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>


---
 kernel/trace/Kconfig        |   12 ++++++++++++
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
index 1ea0d12..aa002ce 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,18 @@ config FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST
 	  functioning properly. It will do tests on all the configured
 	  tracers of ftrace.
 
+config EVENT_TRACE_TEST_SYSCALLS
+	bool "Run selftest on syscall events"
+	depends on FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST
+	help
+	 This option will also enable testing every syscall event.
+	 It only enables the event and disables it and runs various loads
+	 with the event enabled. This adds a bit more time for kernel boot
+	 up since it runs this on every system call defined.
+
+	 TBD - enable a way to actually call the syscalls as we test their
+	       events
+
 config MMIOTRACE
 	bool "Memory mapped IO tracing"
 	depends on HAVE_MMIOTRACE_SUPPORT && PCI
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 0fa8f9f..787f0fb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1326,6 +1326,18 @@ static __init void event_trace_self_tests(void)
 		if (!call->regfunc)
 			continue;
 
+/*
+ * Testing syscall events here is pretty useless, but
+ * we still do it if configured. But this is time consuming.
+ * What we really need is a user thread to perform the
+ * syscalls as we test.
+ */
+#ifndef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE_TEST_SYSCALLS
+		if (call->system &&
+		    strcmp(call->system, "syscalls") == 0)
+			continue;
+#endif
+
 		pr_info("Testing event %s: ", call->name);
 
 		/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ