linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:30:28 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	jsquyres@...co.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 21:38 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Linus, please consider pulling from
> 
>     master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git ummunotify
> 
> This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
> 
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git ummunotify
> 
> This will get "ummunotify," a new character device that allows a
> userspace library to register for MMU notifications; this is
> particularly useful for MPI implementions (message passing libraries
> used in HPC) to be able to keep track of what wacky things consumers
> do to their memory mappings.  My colleague Jeff Squyres from the Open
> MPI project posted a blog entry about why MPI wants this:
> 
> http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/performance/comments/better_linux_memory_tracking/
> 
> His summary of ummunotify:
> 
>   "It’s elegant, doesn’t require strange linker tricks, and seems to
>    work in all cases.  Yay!"
> 
> This code went through several review iterations on lkml and was in
> -mm and -next for quite a few weeks.  Andrew is OK with merging it (I
> think -- Andrew please correct me if I misunderstood you).

Anton Blanchard suggested a while back that this might be integrated
with perf-counters, since perf-counters already does mmap() tracking and
also provides events through an mmap()'ed buffer.

Has anybody looked into this?

If someone did and I missed the discussion on why it isn't appropriate,
kindly point me in the right direction ;-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/