| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:28:23 +0200 From: sebastien cabaniols <sebastien.cabaniols@...com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: performance counter for linux question. Hello list, I am interested by monitoring instructions versus cycles with a Nehalem box using 2.6.31 with PCL. Is there a way with perf report to display both counters ? I used perf record -e cycles -e instructions -a for the recording session. perf report -n seems to be doing what I need but for only one counter. Is this a limitation of perf report ? Is this an architectural limitation of PCL ? Is there more documentation than what is in the perf directory in the 2.6.31 tarball ? -- Sébastien Cabaniols SCI Presales EMEA HP current timezone = UTC+2 (localtime is approx. 14:20) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists