lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:16:10 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
To:	Tejun Heo <teheo@...e.de>
Cc:	Chris Webb <chris@...chsys.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
	Andrei Tanas <andrei@...as.ca>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Tejun.. do we do a FLUSH CACHE before issuing a non-NCQ command ?
> 
> Nope.
> 
>> If not, then I think we may need to add code to do it.
> 
> Hmm... can you explain a bit more?  That seems rather extreme to me.
..

You may recall that I first raised this issue about a year ago,
when my own RAID0 array (MythTV box) started showing errors very
similar to what Chris is reporting.

These were easily triggered by running hddtemp once every few seconds
to log drive temperatures during Myth recording sessions.

hddtemp uses SMART commands.

The actual errors in the logs were command timeouts,
but at this point I no longer remember which opcode was
actually timing out.  Disabling the onboard write cache
immediately "cured" the problem, at the expense of MUCH
slower I/O times.

My theory at the time, was that some non-NCQ commands might be triggering
an internal FLUSH CACHE within the (Hitachi) drive firmware, which then
caused the original command to timeout in libata (due to the large amounts
of data present in the onboard write-caches).

Now that more people are playing the game, we're seeing more and more
reports of strange interactions with smartd running in the background.

I suspect more and more now that this is an (avoidable) interaction
between the write-cache and the SMART opcode, and it could perhaps be
avoided by doing a FLUSH CACHE before any SMART (or non-data command) opcode.

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ