linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLQB: Mark the allocator as broken PowerPC and S390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:51:06 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, sachinp@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLQB: Mark the allocator as broken PowerPC and S390

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:38:08PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > > This machine has two CPUs (0, 1) and two nodes with actual memory (2,3).
> > > After applying a patch to kmem_cache_create, I see in the console
> > >
> > > MEL::Creating cache pgd_cache CPU 0 Node 0
> > > MEL::Creating cache pmd_cache CPU 0 Node 0
> > > MEL::Creating cache pid_namespace CPU 0 Node 0
> > > MEL::Creating cache shmem_inode_cache CPU 0 Node 0
> > > MEL::Creating cache scsi_data_buffer CPU 1 Node 0
> 
> So we have two nodes 2,3 nothing on node 0 and we are creating caches on
> the node that does not exist? SLQB assumes node 0 is present?

It might do somewhere, but it shouldn't. It will ask for node 0
by default presumably if CPU0 is on node 0, but it should be able
to fall back...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/