| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:26:07 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"chris.mason@...cle.com" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v20
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:00:51PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:58:35AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:52:52AM +0800, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:39:29PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That would be good. Sorry for the late work. I'll allocate some time
> > > > in mid next week to help review and benchmark recent writeback works,
> > > > and hope to get things done in this merge window.
> > >
> > > Did you have some chance to get more work done on the your writeback
> > > patches?
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, I'm now testing the patches with commands
> >
> > cp /dev/zero /mnt/test/zero0 &
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/zero1 &
> >
> > and the attached debug patch.
> >
> > One problem I found with ext3/4 is, redirty_tail() is called repeatedly
> > in the traces, which could slow down the inode writeback significantly.
>
> FYI, it's this redirty_tail() called in writeback_single_inode():
>
> /*
> * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
> * the pages.
> */
> redirty_tail(inode);
Hmm, this looks like an old fashioned problem get blew up by the
128MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES.
The inode was redirtied by the busy cp/dd processes. Now it takes much
more time to sync 128MB, so that a heavy dirtier can easily redirty
the inode in that time window.
One single invocation of redirty_tail() could hold up the writeback of
current inode for up to 30 seconds.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> > Ideal is to call requeue_[partial_]io() instead of redirty_tail().
> >
> > [ 131.963885] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=0
> > [ 131.966171] global dirty=4105 writeback=18793 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 132.780826] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-0:15 pid=1150 n=0
> > [ 132.783097] global dirty=4105 writeback=16623 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 134.307094] redirty_tail() +542: inode=12
> > [ 134.815776] redirty_tail() +542: inode=13
> > [ 134.817709] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=11493
> > [ 134.821242] global dirty=4192 writeback=16203 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=21275 skipped=0 file=13 written=4430
> > [ 135.599954] redirty_tail() +542: inode=12
> > [ 136.372523] redirty_tail() +542: inode=13
> > [ 136.386748] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=11570
> > [ 136.432168] global dirty=4308 writeback=15752 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=21198 skipped=0 file=13 written=4650
> > [ 137.789115] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-0:15 pid=1150 n=0
> > [ 138.587178] global dirty=9551 writeback=10755 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 138.962743] redirty_tail() +542: inode=12
> > [ 139.395024] redirty_tail() +542: inode=13
> > [ 139.403194] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=11893
> > [ 139.413026] global dirty=4101 writeback=16630 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=20875 skipped=0 file=0 written=2
> > [ 139.426074] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=0
> > [ 139.435190] global dirty=4101 writeback=16378 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 140.266713] redirty_tail() +542: inode=12
> > [ 140.449304] redirty_tail() +542: inode=13
> > [ 140.496241] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=11678
> > [ 140.508339] global dirty=4203 writeback=19220 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=21090 skipped=0 file=13 written=4254
> > [ 141.649192] redirty_tail() +542: inode=12
> > [ 141.971276] redirty_tail() +542: inode=13
> > [ 141.988572] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=11304
> > [ 142.000107] global dirty=4112 writeback=18362 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=21464 skipped=0 file=13 written=4541
> >
> > btrfs pattern is almost the same, but with an extra (metadata) inode 1.
> >
> > [ 464.443873] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-btrfs-1 pid=2865 n=0
> > [ 464.450458] global dirty=163 writeback=4375 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 464.655999] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-8:0 pid=2816 n=0
> > [ 464.664478] global dirty=3873 writeback=1175 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=32768 skipped=0 file=0 written=0
> > [ 465.291059] redirty_tail() +542: inode=257
> > [ 465.331584] redirty_tail() +542: inode=258
> > [ 465.346433] redirty_tail() +560: inode=1
> > [ 465.352016] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-btrfs-1 pid=2865 n=14480
> > [ 465.355797] global dirty=337 writeback=3980 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=18288 skipped=0 file=1 written=0
> > [ 466.226489] redirty_tail() +542: inode=257
> > [ 466.280894] redirty_tail() +542: inode=258
> > [ 466.282270] redirty_tail() +560: inode=1
> > [ 466.288079] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-btrfs-1 pid=2865 n=14300
> > [ 466.291738] global dirty=666 writeback=3807 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=18468 skipped=0 file=1 written=0
> > [ 467.101730] redirty_tail() +542: inode=257
> > [ 467.134303] redirty_tail() +542: inode=258
> > [ 467.135675] redirty_tail() +560: inode=1
> > [ 467.144120] fs/fs-writeback.c +809 wb_writeback(): comm=flush-btrfs-1 pid=2865 n=14032
> > [ 467.147302] global dirty=331 writeback=3665 nfs=0 flags=__ towrite=18736 skipped=0 file=1 written=0
> > [ 467.964652] redirty_tail() +542: inode=257
> > [ 468.002423] redirty_tail() +542: inode=258
> > [ 468.003795] redirty_tail() +560: inode=1
> >
> > I'm looking into it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fengguang
>
> > fs/fs-writeback.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > mm/page-writeback.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:51:09.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:51:47.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> > pages_written += write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
> > get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh,
> > &bdi_thresh, bdi);
> > + writeback_debug_report(pages_written, &wbc);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:51:46.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:51:47.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -68,6 +68,33 @@ enum {
> > #define WS_USED (1 << WS_USED_B)
> > #define WS_ONSTACK (1 << WS_ONSTACK_B)
> >
> > +void print_writeback_control(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > +{
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG
> > + "global dirty=%lu writeback=%lu nfs=%lu "
> > + "flags=%c%c towrite=%ld skipped=%ld "
> > + "file=%lu written=%lu\n",
> > + global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY),
> > + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK),
> > + global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS),
> > + wbc->encountered_congestion ? 'C':'_',
> > + wbc->more_io ? 'M':'_',
> > + wbc->nr_to_write,
> > + wbc->pages_skipped,
> > + wbc->last_file,
> > + wbc->last_file_written);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __writeback_debug_report(long n, struct writeback_control *wbc,
> > + const char *file, int line, const char *func)
> > +{
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s +%d %s(): comm=%s pid=%d n=%ld\n",
> > + file, line, func,
> > + current->comm, current->pid,
> > + n);
> > + print_writeback_control(wbc);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline bool bdi_work_on_stack(struct bdi_work *work)
> > {
> > return test_bit(WS_ONSTACK_B, &work->state);
> > @@ -302,7 +329,7 @@ static void requeue_io(struct inode *ino
> > */
> > static void requeue_partial_io(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > - if (time_before(wbc->last_file_time + HZ, jiffies) ||
> > + if (time_before(wbc->last_file_time + 1000 * HZ, jiffies) ||
> > wbc->last_file_written == 0 ||
> > wbc->last_file_written >= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES) {
> > requeue_io(inode);
> > @@ -749,6 +776,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
> > args->nr_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
> > wrote += MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write;
> >
> > + writeback_debug_report(wrote, &wbc);
> > /*
> > * If we ran out of stuff to write, bail unless more_io got set
> > */
>
> > Subject: track redirty_tail() calls
> >
> > It helps a lot to know how redirty_tail() are called.
> >
> > Cc: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
> > ---
> > fs/fs-writeback.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:51:47.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-19 10:52:03.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -290,6 +290,21 @@ void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_
> > bdi_alloc_queue_work(bdi, &args);
> > }
> >
> > +#define redirty_tail(inode) \
> > + do { \
> > + __redirty_tail(inode, __LINE__); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > +#define requeue_io(inode) \
> > + do { \
> > + __requeue_io(inode, __LINE__); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > +#define requeue_partial_io(wbc, inode) \
> > + do { \
> > + __requeue_partial_io(wbc, inode, __LINE__); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > /*
> > * Redirty an inode: set its when-it-was dirtied timestamp and move it to the
> > * furthest end of its superblock's dirty-inode list.
> > @@ -299,7 +314,7 @@ void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_
> > * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
> > * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
> > */
> > -static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode)
> > +static void __redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, int line)
> > {
> > struct bdi_writeback *wb = &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
> >
> > @@ -311,23 +326,33 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *i
> > inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> > }
> > list_move(&inode->i_list, &wb->b_dirty);
> > +
> > + if (sysctl_dirty_debug) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "redirty_tail() +%d: inode=%lu\n",
> > + line, inode->i_ino);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > * requeue inode for re-scanning after bdi->b_io list is exhausted.
> > */
> > -static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
> > +static void __requeue_io(struct inode *inode, int line)
> > {
> > struct bdi_writeback *wb = &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
> >
> > list_move(&inode->i_list, &wb->b_more_io);
> > +
> > + if (sysctl_dirty_debug) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "requeue_io() +%d: inode=%lu\n",
> > + line, inode->i_ino);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > * continue io on this inode on next writeback if
> > * it has not accumulated large enough writeback io chunk
> > */
> > -static void requeue_partial_io(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct inode *inode)
> > +static void __requeue_partial_io(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct inode *inode, int line)
> > {
> > if (time_before(wbc->last_file_time + 1000 * HZ, jiffies) ||
> > wbc->last_file_written == 0 ||
> > @@ -337,6 +362,11 @@ static void requeue_partial_io(struct wr
> > }
> >
> > list_move_tail(&inode->i_list, &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb.b_io);
> > +
> > + if (sysctl_dirty_debug) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "requeue_partial_io() +%d: inode=%lu\n",
> > + line, inode->i_ino);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists