lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:59:05 GMT
From:	"tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Fix thinko, actually initialize full tree

Commit-ID:  49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:50:19 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:53:21 +0200

rcu: Fix thinko, actually initialize full tree

Commit de078d8 ("rcu: Need to update rnp->gpnum if preemptable RCU
is to be reliable") repeatedly and incorrectly initializes the root
rcu_node structure's ->gpnum field rather than initializing the
->gpnum field of each node in the tree.  Fix this.  Also add an
additional consistency check to catch this in the future.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
LKML-Reference: <125329262011-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 kernel/rcutree.c        |   11 ++++-------
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ae4a553..1b32cdd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -601,8 +601,6 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
-	struct rcu_node *rnp_cur;
-	struct rcu_node *rnp_end;
 
 	if (!cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
@@ -659,13 +657,12 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
 	 * one corresponding to this CPU, due to the fact that we have
 	 * irqs disabled.
 	 */
-	rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
-	for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
-		spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
+	for (rnp = &rsp->node[0]; rnp < &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; rnp++) {
+		spin_lock(&rnp->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
 		rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
-		rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
+		rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
 		rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
-		spin_unlock(&rnp_cur->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
+		spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);	/* irqs already disabled. */
 	}
 
 	rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state now OK. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index cd6047c..09b7325 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -476,10 +476,12 @@ static void rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 
 /*
  * Because there is no preemptable RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
- * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.
+ * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.  So check only for
+ * bogus qsmask values.
  */
 static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask);
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists