linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:40:47 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:50:47PM -0400, Siarhei Liakh wrote:
 > This patch is a logical extension of the protection provided by
 > CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA to LKMs. The protection is provided by splitting
 > module_core and module_init into three logical parts each and setting
 > appropriate page access permissions for each individual section:
 > 
 >  1. Code: RO+X
 >  2. RO data: RO+NX
 >  3. RW data: RW+NX

Hi Siarhei,
 I tried out this patch on 2.6.31, and got the following trace during bootup..

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1003 ftrace_bug+0x198/0x27e() (Not tainted)
Hardware name: VGN-Z540N
Modules linked in: output(+)
Pid: 115, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.31-23.fc12.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81064244>] warn_slowpath_common+0x95/0xc3
 [<ffffffffa0000193>] ? video_output_register+0x11/0x10a [output]
 [<ffffffff81064299>] warn_slowpath_null+0x27/0x3d
 [<ffffffff810d4a0e>] ftrace_bug+0x198/0x27e
 [<ffffffffa0000193>] ? video_output_register+0x11/0x10a [output]
 [<ffffffff810d5c66>] ftrace_convert_nops+0x201/0x2b9
 [<ffffffffa0000193>] ? video_output_register+0x11/0x10a [output]
 [<ffffffff810d5d6a>] ftrace_module_notify+0x4c/0x7f
 [<ffffffff815099c5>] notifier_call_chain+0x72/0xba
 [<ffffffff81086db1>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8e
 [<ffffffff81086dc8>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x63/0x8e
 [<ffffffff81086e1a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x27/0x3d
 [<ffffffff810a466a>] sys_init_module+0xb7/0x249
 [<ffffffff81011f42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace 95b33ebf87286ae6 ]---
ftrace faulted on writing [<ffffffffa0000193>] video_output_register+0x11/0x10a [output]


I guess ftrace is trying to NOP out something in the modules which
are marked read-only ?

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/