linux-kernel - Re: mailing list for trace users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:30:20 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	fweisbec@...il.com, acme@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mhiramat@...hat.com, postmaster@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mailing list for trace users

* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:47:25 +0200
> 
> > Could you please also create the linux-perf-users list, for perf 
> > events and the perf tool related user questions? (We have asked for 
> > this before but must have gotten lost somewhere)
> 
> I think your communities are similar enough and small enough that you 
> could share this list.

It's two separate subsystems. There's a lot of non-tracing aspects of 
performance events: it does profiling, counting, latency analysis, etc. 
The tool is named 'perf', the subsystem is named 'performance events', 
and the most typical workflows dont do any tracing.

And i beg to differ about the size of the communities. It's just been 
added upstream...

Also, what is the policy for adding new lists to vger.kernel.org? If a 
subsystem maintainer asks for a list named after a core kernel 
subsystem, how frequently is it rejected, and on what basis?

I find it sad that such an arbitrary looking negative decision from you 
forces a user list away from vger. I wouldnt mind it to be closed if it 
has no significant traffic after a year or lifetime or so - many vger 
lists have almost no traffic to begin with.

Also, i cannot help but to observe the fact that you've fought the 
original perfcounters project in a very ugly and public way less than a 
year ago. Dont you think that you 'deciding' this matter in such a 
negative fashion is a conflict of interest?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/