linux-kernel - Re: [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:22:28 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power
 management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce
 cpuidle to POWER.

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
> 
> Hi Len, (or other acpi folks),
> 
> I had a question regarding ACPI-cpuidle interaction in the current
> implementation.
> 
> Currently, every cpu (i.e. acpi_processor) registers to cpuidle as
> a cpuidle_device. So every cpu has to go through the process of
> setting up the idle states and then registering as a cpuidle device.
> 
> What exactly is the reason behind this?
> 

technically a BIOS can opt to give you C states via ACPI on some cpus,
but not on others.

in practice when this happens it tends to be a bug.. but it's
technically a valid configuration



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/