| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:29:52 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/mutex.c:280
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:33:19 +0200
Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com> wrote:
> Dne Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:27:08 +0800 Xiaotian Feng napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got following messages when I resume from suspend with 2.6.31.
> > Is there anything wrong? Thanks.
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > kernel/mutex.c:280 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 2473,
> > name: pm-suspend 2 locks held by pm-suspend/2473:
> > #0: (&buffer->mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff8115ab13>]
> > sysfs_write_file+0x3c/0x137
> > #1: (pm_mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff810865b5>]
> > enter_state+0x39/0x130 Pid: 2473, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.31
> > #1 Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff810792f0>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x22/0x24
> > [<ffffffff8104a2ef>] __might_sleep+0x107/0x10b
> > [<ffffffff8141fca9>] mutex_lock_nested+0x25/0x43
> > [<ffffffff81073537>] clocksource_resume+0x1c/0x60
> > [<ffffffff81072902>] timekeeping_resume+0x1e/0x1c8
> > [<ffffffff812aee62>] __sysdev_resume+0x25/0xcf
> > [<ffffffff812aef79>] sysdev_resume+0x6d/0xae
> > [<ffffffff810864f8>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x12b/0x1af
> > [<ffffffff8108665b>] enter_state+0xdf/0x130
> > [<ffffffff81085dc3>] state_store+0xb6/0xd3
> > [<ffffffff81204c73>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19
> > [<ffffffff8115abd2>] sysfs_write_file+0xfb/0x137
> > [<ffffffff811057d2>] vfs_write+0xae/0x10b
> > [<ffffffff81208392>] ? __up_read+0x1a/0x7f
> > [<ffffffff811058ef>] sys_write+0x4a/0x6e
> > [<ffffffff81011b82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> I've just noticed the same in the latest git.
> sysdev_resume() runs with IRQs disabled, but clocksource_resume() uses
> a mutex. Hmm, in 2.6.30 it used to be spinlock. This was changed to
> mutex by:
>
> commit 75c5158f70c065b9704b924503d96e8297838f79
> Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Date: Fri Aug 14 15:47:30 2009 +0200
>
> timekeeping: Update clocksource with stop_machine
>
> update_wall_time calls change_clocksource HZ times per second to
> check if a new clock source is available. In close to 100% of all
> calls there is no new clock. Replace the tick based check by an
> update done with stop_machine.
Hmm, the spinlock to mutex conversion is necessary to make it possible
to use stop_machine to install the new clocksource. At the same time
clocksource_resume is called early in the resume cycle with interrupts
disabled and may not take a mutex. Question is: does it have to? There
shouldn't be any processes running that can change the list of
installed clocksources. Can you test if this patch fixes the problem?
--
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: resume clocksource without taking the clocksource mutex
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
git commit 75c5158f70c065b9 converted the clocksource spinlock to a
mutex. This causes the following BUG:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/mutex.c:280 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 2473,
name: pm-suspend 2 locks held by pm-suspend/2473:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff8115ab13>]
sysfs_write_file+0x3c/0x137
#1: (pm_mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff810865b5>]
enter_state+0x39/0x130 Pid: 2473, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.31
#1 Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810792f0>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x22/0x24
[<ffffffff8104a2ef>] __might_sleep+0x107/0x10b
[<ffffffff8141fca9>] mutex_lock_nested+0x25/0x43
[<ffffffff81073537>] clocksource_resume+0x1c/0x60
[<ffffffff81072902>] timekeeping_resume+0x1e/0x1c8
[<ffffffff812aee62>] __sysdev_resume+0x25/0xcf
[<ffffffff812aef79>] sysdev_resume+0x6d/0xae
[<ffffffff810864f8>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x12b/0x1af
[<ffffffff8108665b>] enter_state+0xdf/0x130
[<ffffffff81085dc3>] state_store+0xb6/0xd3
[<ffffffff81204c73>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19
[<ffffffff8115abd2>] sysfs_write_file+0xfb/0x137
[<ffffffff811057d2>] vfs_write+0xae/0x10b
[<ffffffff81208392>] ? __up_read+0x1a/0x7f
[<ffffffff811058ef>] sys_write+0x4a/0x6e
[<ffffffff81011b82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
clocksource_resume is called early in the resume process, there
is only one cpu, no processes are running and the interrupts are
disabled. It is therefore possible to resume the clocksources
without taking the clocksource mutex.
Reported-by: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c linux-2.6-clocksource/kernel/time/clocksource.c
--- linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2009-09-19 10:16:49.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-clocksource/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2009-09-24 17:09:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -394,15 +394,11 @@ void clocksource_resume(void)
{
struct clocksource *cs;
- mutex_lock(&clocksource_mutex);
-
list_for_each_entry(cs, &clocksource_list, list)
if (cs->resume)
cs->resume();
clocksource_resume_watchdog();
-
- mutex_unlock(&clocksource_mutex);
}
/**
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists