| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:16:41 +0200 From: Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...c.fr> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.31.1 BUG #include <asm/bitsperlong.h> The problem is that when I compile an application that never caused any problem before I get an error due to incorrect reference to <asm/bitsperlong> This was due to int-ll64.h including <asm/bitsperlong.h> which does not exists. Is the correct solution to replace symbolic link ? /usr/src/linux/include/asm->asm-x86 by /usr/src/linux/include/asm->asm-generic Bernard Pidoux On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > In kernel 2.6.31.1 the following files in > > /usr/src/linux-2.6.31.1/include/asm-generic/ > > include <asm/bitsperlong.h> > > while they should #include <asm-generic/bitsperlong.h> It would be wrong to include the generic version directly. We need access to the arch specifics definitions before we include the generic version. See how different architectures does various things in their: arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/bitsperlong.h Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists