linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Privilege dropping security module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:38:55 +0200
From:	"Rob Meijer" <capibara@...all.nl>
To:	"Andy Spencer" <andy753421@...il.com>
Cc:	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Privilege dropping security module

On Sat, September 26, 2009 23:35, Andy Spencer wrote:
>> It's amazing who much of this stuff there is to attend to.  If you
>> haven't, run checkpatch.py on your patches. You'll need to pass that
>> eventually.
>
> I've fixed the remaining things that checkpatch.pl suggests as well as a
> few others and will include those checks for future patches.
>
>
>> Hmm. You are working with the Linux DAC mechanism, even if only within
>> a process tree. You're not dropping privilege, you're applying a mask
>> to the file permission bits, currently for file system objects, and
>> with other objects (sysvipc at least) in the future. Hmm. modemask?
>> Something derived from "restricted process tree?"
>
> `Access Control Masking' or `Policy Masking' perhaps?
>

Or  'Permission Attenuation' ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/