linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] autofs4 - update autofs4 to deal with VFS locking change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:41:27 +0800
From:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
CC:	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	Yehuda Saheh <yehuda@...dream.net>,
	Jim Garlick <garlick@...l.gov>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] autofs4 - update autofs4 to deal with VFS locking
 change

Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Ian Kent wrote:
> 
>> A change to the VFS path walk locking is needed to resolve an issue
>> identified by Sage Weil. This locking change requires significant
>> changes to the autofs4 module to allow it to callback to userspace
>> without introducing a deadlock.
>>
>> To cope with the change the autofs4 module needs to redirect mount
>> requests from ->d_revalidate() to ->lookup() if the directory
>> inode mutex is held when a callback needs to be done. Note that we
>> cannot redirect these requests when the mutex is not held because,
>> to function correctly, the mutex must be held over both revalidate
>> and lookup.
>>
>> Of the patches in the series most are cleanups and refactoring done
>> to keep the real change in "autofs4 - always use lookup for lookup"
>> as clean as possible. Unfortuneately, there is still quite a bit
>> left in it.
>>
>> Also, I need confirmation that the patch that changes the VFS path
>> walk locking is in fact correct, or at least like for like to what
>> will be submitted. I had some difficulty with the original patches
>> that were paosted. The patch in question below is "vfs: make
>> real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held".
> 
> It looks identical to be the original two folded into one patch.  I'll 
> repost those two now, freshened against Linus' tree.  The first has just 
> the functional change, and the cleanup is in the second (as per 
> Christoph's review).
> 
>> I've done quite a bit of fairly heavy stress testing of the patch
>> series and they (finally) hold up to it. Although I have also
>> managed to uncover a locking bug in the user space daemon as a
>> result, ;)
> 
> I'm glad some other good has come of it.  Thanks, Ian, for carrying this 
> through!

Not quite so good as I haven't fixed it yet.
But that's user space and it happens occasionally under an extended
heavy load so it will take a while to work out.

Ian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/