linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/8] omap: Fix incorrect 730 vs 850 detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:37:41 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sanjeev Premi <premi@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] omap: Fix incorrect 730 vs 850 detection

Commit cd92204924fafbd5c7241dfd12ca3176d542e0c5 added
support for omap850. However, the patch accidentally
removed the wrong ifdef:

 #  define cpu_is_omap730()		1
 # endif
 #endif
+#else
+# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
+#  undef  cpu_is_omap850
+#  define cpu_is_omap850()		1
+# endif
+#endif

...

 void omap2_check_revision(void);

 #endif    /* defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) */
-
-#endif

Instead of removing removing the #endif at the end of the file,
the #endif before #else should have been removed.

But we cannot have multiple #else statements as pointed out by
Alistair Buxton <a.j.buxton@...il.com>. So the fix is to:

- remove the non-multi-omap special handling, as we need to
  detect between omap730 and omap850 anyways.

- add the missing #endif back to the end of the file

Reported-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@...com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
---
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h |   37 ++++++++++++---------------------
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
index 11e73d9..f129efb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
@@ -303,32 +303,21 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
 #define cpu_is_omap2430()		0
 #define cpu_is_omap3430()		0
 
-#if defined(MULTI_OMAP1)
-# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730)
-#  undef  cpu_is_omap730
-#  define cpu_is_omap730()		is_omap730()
-# endif
-# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
-#  undef  cpu_is_omap850
-#  define cpu_is_omap850()		is_omap850()
-# endif
-#else
-# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730)
-#  undef  cpu_is_omap730
-#  define cpu_is_omap730()		1
-# endif
-#endif
-#else
-# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
-#  undef  cpu_is_omap850
-#  define cpu_is_omap850()		1
-# endif
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Whether we have MULTI_OMAP1 or not, we still need to distinguish
- * between 330 vs. 1510 and 1611B/5912 vs. 1710.
+ * between 730 vs 850, 330 vs. 1510 and 1611B/5912 vs. 1710.
  */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730)
+# undef  cpu_is_omap730
+# define cpu_is_omap730()		is_omap730()
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
+# undef  cpu_is_omap850
+# define cpu_is_omap850()		is_omap850()
+#endif
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX)
 # undef  cpu_is_omap310
 # undef  cpu_is_omap1510
@@ -433,3 +422,5 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
 
 int omap_chip_is(struct omap_chip_id oci);
 void omap2_check_revision(void);
+
+#endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/