linux-kernel - [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:24:53 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	corentincj@...aif.net
Cc:	acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera().

 Currently the annotation for function eeepc_enable_camera() is
__init, and refers to a
function eeepc_hotk_add() which is non-init. Use __devinit for both
functions which is
more appropriate and fixes a section mismatch warning.

 We were warned by the following warning:

  LD      drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x12e1): Section
mismatch in reference from the function eeepc_hotk_add() to the
function .init.text:eeepc_enable_camera()
The function eeepc_hotk_add() references
the function __init eeepc_enable_camera().
This is often because eeepc_hotk_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of eeepc_enable_camera is wrong.

---
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>

--- linus/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
12:44:40.000000000 +0600
+++ rakib/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
12:48:42.000000000 +0600
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops eeepc_rfk
 	.set_block = eeepc_rfkill_set,
 };

-static void __init eeepc_enable_camera(void)
+static void __devinit eeepc_enable_camera(void)
 {
 	/*
 	 * If the following call to set_acpi() fails, it's because there's no
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int eeepc_input_init(struct devic
 	return 0;
 }

-static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int __devinit eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
 	int result;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/