lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:29:03 -0700
From:	"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@...el.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1]

Jesse,

I will send you a replacement patch since the size of the patch is not so big.

Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:14 PM
To: Chris Wright
Cc: Kay, Allen M; Chris Wright; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1]

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:17:21 -0700
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:

> * Kay, Allen M (allen.m.kay@...el.com) wrote:
> > On the other hand, can we say VT-d PT mode is mainly for KVM
> > virtualization use case?  If so, is it reasonable to say
> > performance of host P2P in this mode is not of highest priority?
> 
> Guess it depends on the workload.  Would be helpful to identify a use
> case that is p2p heavy (and then the impact of enabling ACS).
> 
> > If not, another option is to have a kernel boot parameter to
> > configure an kernel boot instance to be either host kernel
> > optimized or virtualization optimized.  I don't know whether this
> > is a reasonable or not ...
> 
> I was thinking that ACS could be enabled if an IOMMU is enabled.  Not
> a perfect fit, but seems reasonably close.

Allen, did you want to do these changes as an incremental patch on your
last one or just send me a replacement?  Either way is fine with me.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ