linux-kernel - Re: [regression, bisected] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:22 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jan Scholz <scholz@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>
Cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> writes:
> 
> >> Alternatively, you could introduce a new flag IRQF_NOSUSPEND and use that
> >> instead of IRQF_TIMER.  That would be cleaner than using IRQF_TIMER for
> >> non-timer interrupts IMHO.
> >
> > I totally agree. The current patch is still good for stable though.
> >
> > I'll send it to Greg after I've upstreamed it, we can introduce IRQF_NOSUSPEND
> > in a second patch.
> 
> How's upstreaming going? I can neither find the patch in Linus branch,
> nor in linux-next. Could it be that it got lost?

More likely Ben didn't have the time to work on it.

Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/